Skip to main content
Glama
NikolaNddTesla

NikolaNddTesla/ssh-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to NikolaNddTesla/ssh-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI assistants to securely operate remote servers via persistent SSH sessions, with tools for command execution, file transfer, directory listing, and system monitoring.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing multiple SSH servers via AI assistants, offering tools for remote command execution, file operations, and system monitoring.
      11
      12 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for managing remote SSH servers, enabling AI agents to execute commands, transfer files, and perform deployment operations securely.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables remote SSH command execution and bidirectional file transfers through a standardized interface. It allows AI assistants to securely manage remote servers while keeping credentials isolated and applying command-level security controls.
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      SSH-based MCP server that enables remote execution of SSH commands, file transfers, and secure server management via the MCP protocol.
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants full SSH/SFTP remote operations — session management, command execution, interactive shells, file transfers, port forwarding, and system diagnostics.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: file transfer, server configuration, proxy management, connection handling, or command execution. Even similar tools like connect and quick_connect have clear differences (persistent vs temporary). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (upload_directory, add_server, list_proxies), but a few single-word verbs like connect, disconnect, and execute break the pattern slightly. The inconsistency is minor and does not cause confusion.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 21 tools, the server spans multiple sub-domains (file transfer, server CRUD, proxy management, connection lifecycle), making the count feel heavy but not excessive. It is on the borderline for a typical MCP server scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers server CRUD, proxy management, file transfer (upload/download, file/directory), file read/write, and command execution. Notable gaps include remote file deletion and remote directory listing, which agents might need but can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive