Skip to main content
Glama
NightSquawk

Proxmox MCP Server

by NightSquawk

Related Servers

Alternatives to Proxmox MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Policy-aware MCP server for Proxmox VE that maps the official API schema to MCP tools, enabling node health, disk, network, journal, updates, guest configuration, snapshots, backups, consoles, task lifecycle, service, command, and file-transfer operations with role-based access control.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing Proxmox VE clusters — provision VMs and containers, manage snapshots and backups, execute commands, browse storage, and monitor resources through natural language
      34
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with the Proxmox Virtual Environment API, enabling management of VMs, containers, storage, and cluster resources through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Proxmox VE that enables read-only cluster inspection, VM/container lifecycle operations, snapshots, migration, and provisioning with safe confirmation gates.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two endpoint categories (PVE vs PDM) are cleanly separated by the pve_/pdm_ prefixes, and within each the list/describe/call trio has clearly distinct purposes. The only minor ambiguity is that the two list and two describe tools are functionally identical except for their target API, which could cause a misselection if an agent fails to notice the prefix.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a very consistent pattern: {api}_list_endpoints, {api}_describe_endpoint, {api}_call_endpoint for both PVE and PDM. The pattern is perfectly parallel across both surfaces, though the slightly verbose prefix scheme (pve_/pdm_) could arguably be more concise. This is a strong, predictable convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an ideal count for a server that proxies two large API surfaces. The two trios each cover the full discover→describe→call workflow for their respective API, making each tool earn its place without any redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The server's purpose is to proxy arbitrary Proxmox APIs, and it fully covers the necessary surface: discover endpoints, inspect a specific endpoint's spec, and execute the call. The read/write gate and permission metadata are handled by the underlying catalog rather than requiring additional tools. There are no dead-end operations since any Proxmox endpoint can be reached indirectly through this generic pattern.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues