@nightsquawktech/gohighlevel-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to @nightsquawktech/gohighlevel-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for GoHighLevel API v2 that provides 50+ tools for CRM, billing, marketing, and operations workflows, enabling natural language interaction with contacts, opportunities, conversations, and more.501MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to interact with GoHighLevel CRM data, including contacts, conversations, call transcripts, broker lead overviews, pipelines/opportunities, and task creation. Supports both stdio and HTTP transports for local and remote use.ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that wraps the GoHighLevel API v2, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to interact with GHL CRM as structured tools for managing contacts, conversations, pipelines, appointments, payments, and more.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server for Quo/OpenPhone automation across messaging, calls, contacts, users, phone numbers, and webhooks via a clean stdio tool surface.212AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable AI clients to operate a GoHighLevel account through chat — searching and updating CRM records, working pipelines and conversations, enrolling contacts in existing workflows, preparing appointments and follow-ups, and inspecting account health across hundreds of GHL API operations. Consequential writes are staged behind confirmation gates, and multiple transport modes and tool profiles keep setup safe for beginners and production use alike.ISC
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server covering the full GoHighLevel API surface with 651 tools, enabling management of contacts, opportunities, calendars, invoices, and more through natural language, with multi-tenant support and read-only safety defaults.500115 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 56 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., get vs search, v1 vs v2 custom fields). However, the high number of tools (56) introduces some potential confusion between similar operations like 'get_contact' vs 'search_contacts', and between custom field variants.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'ghl_' + verb_noun (e.g., ghl_get_contact, ghl_create_custom_field_v2). The naming is predictable and uniform across the entire set.
With 56 tools covering contacts, custom fields, opportunities, conversations, calendars, and more, the count is on the higher side but still reasonable for a comprehensive CRM integration. It is not excessive given the breadth of API endpoints.
The toolset covers most CRUD operations and search for key entities like contacts, opportunities, and appointments. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no pipeline stage management, no webhooks), but the core workflows are well-supported.