Skip to main content
Glama
Nidhideep

SAP Clean Core MCP Server

by Nidhideep

Related Servers

Alternatives to SAP Clean Core MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely read and write SAP ABAP development objects via the ADT REST API, enforcing policy-based guardrails such as package/namespace allow-lists, read-only mode, human approvals, and audit logging.
      8
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Facilitates interaction with SAP ABAP systems via ADT APIs, enabling object management, transport handling, and code analysis.
      100
      211 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read, write, activate, and transport ABAP code in SAP systems via ABAP ADT REST API, without needing SAP GUI.
      24
      396 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: bulk classification, level explanation, successor search, statistics, object type listing, single lookup, partner search, component-based search, pattern search, and semantic search. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'cc_' prefix and most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., classify_objects, list_object_types). However, a few like 'partner_objects' and 'semantic_search' deviate from this pattern, introducing minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools covering classification, search, statistics, and partner objects, the count is well-scoped for the SAP Clean Core compliance domain. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for Clean Core compliance: bulk and single object classification, level explanation, successor discovery, statistics, multiple search methods (exact, pattern, semantic, by component, by partner), and object type listing. No obvious gaps are present.