Editar una entrada pendiente

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of transparency. It mentions the 'pending' status constraint and that only indicated fields are applied, but lacks details on side effects, permissions, reversibility, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences that get straight to the point without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too brief to provide comprehensive context. It omits information about expected outputs, side effects, or any operational details, making it incomplete for a user to fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not clarify individual parameters. The schema provides some field descriptions (e.g., activityName), but the overall description adds no meaning beyond stating that fields are editable, leaving many parameters unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool edits fields of an entry with a 'pending' status, which distinguishes it from other tools. However, it could be more specific about which fields or the nature of the edits.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Solo se aplican los campos indicados' (only the indicated fields are applied), but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus other editing or entry-related tools, nor any conditions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.