puissance_max

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description still discloses key behavior: it is read-only, defaults to yesterday when no dates are supplied, and dates are inclusive. It does not cover permissions, error behavior, or edge cases such as supplying only one date.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: purpose first, then practical usage, default behavior, date format, and read-only status. Every sentence adds useful information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only query with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers purpose, use case, default period, date format, inclusivity, and read-only safety. Remaining gaps are minor edge cases around partial date ranges and timezone assumptions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter semantics. It usefully adds the date format AAAA-MM-JJ, the fact that dates are inclusive, and the default of yesterday, but it does not clarify individual behavior for debut versus fin or partial parameter combinations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: it returns daily maximum reached power in VA and the strongest day in the period. This is clear enough to identify the tool, though it does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings such as conso_periode or courbe_charge.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides a clear use case: determining whether the subscription is too small or too large, and states the default behavior when dates are omitted. It does not explicitly say when to prefer this over sibling tools like conso_periode or courbe_charge.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.