Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to NexTool MCP for GLPI

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to GLPI IT Service Management, enabling ticket management, asset search, and ITIL processes via natural language.
      2 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with a GLPI instance through its REST API, allowing natural-language consultation, creation, and updating of tickets, followups, tasks, solutions, knowledge base articles, suppliers, contacts, contracts, and statistics.
      52
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to GLPI through the Model Context Protocol, enabling management of tickets, ITIL objects, assets, projects, tasks, documents, sessions, entities and massive actions via the legacy REST API. It supports GLPI 10 and 11 with safe defaults such as read-only mode, disabled destructive operations and masked secrets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage GLPI inventory, tickets, and CIA security fields via its REST API.
      9
      2 npm
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server allowing an AI assistant to interact directly with your GLPI instance via its REST API, enabling ticket management, knowledge base operations, and statistics.
      40
      4
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 111 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools are clearly distinct by entity, but several overlap: glpi_search can replace many list tools, followup/solution/task tools are duplicated per ITIL type, and glpi_list_rule_criteria vs glpi_list_rule_ticket_criteria are near-identical. Descriptions help, but the sheer volume makes misselection likely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the glpi_ prefix, snake_case, and consistent verb_noun patterns (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, add_). Minor irregularities like glpi_change_active_entities and glpi_set_webhook_active are still readable and fit the overall convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    111 tools is extreme for any MCP server; many CRUD operations are repeated per entity and some generic tools overlap with specific ones. This surface is far too large for an agent to select from reliably.

    Completeness3/5

    Broad domain coverage exists across tickets, problems, changes, users, assets, webhooks, and more, but CRUD is asymmetric: no delete for tickets/problems/changes/users/groups/locations, no create/update for groups and locations, and missing child operations like add_change_task or add_problem_task. Agents will hit dead ends for common lifecycle actions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues