Skip to main content
Glama
Neurobyteio

AgentRisk MCP

Official
by Neurobyteio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentRisk MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • verdix by verdixapi

      verdixofficial

      verdixapi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check an EVM address on Base for risk (safe, caution, danger) before sending funds, with reasons, paid per call via x402 from the user's own wallet.
      6
      263 npm
      MIT

    • VetAgent

      jakegu1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pre-trade token safety check for AI agents. Simulates a sell before you buy, then reports honeypot, tax, liquidity, pair age, same-ticker impersonation and owner powers as one low/medium/high/unknown verdict. Fail-closed: when a critical check cannot run it answers unknown rather than guessing low. Publishes its own measured error rate with the benchmark harness in the repo.
      3
      MIT

    • basescope

      chasdaddy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      basescope is a read-only onchain safety layer for AI agents: it answers "is this token/contract/approval safe?" on Base and EVM chains (honeypot/rug checks, risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS/Basenames, gas, prices), with no private keys and no required API keys.
      13
      13 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is uniquely defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('check_token_risk'), and with only one tool there are no inconsistent naming conventions to flag.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels thin for a server, even though the tool itself is comprehensive and well-scoped. It sits at the borderline of being too few, but the tool's depth partially compensates for the lack of additional tools.

    Completeness5/5

    For the stated purpose of token risk checking on Base, the tool covers a wide range of critical checks including honeypot detection, deployer history, impersonation, LP-lock verification, and live sell simulation. It provides a clear decision, leaving no obvious dead end within its domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources