Enlace de descarga (masivo)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, and an output schema exists, so the description's main contribution is the 15-minute link expiry and the JSON format — genuinely useful operational context. It does not say whether the job must be complete, what happens if the link expires, or whether links are single-use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; the expiry, scope, and format arrive in the right order. It is arguably too terse for a tool with an undocumented parameter, but nothing in it is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with annotations and an output schema, the description covers the essentials: what the link is for, its lifetime, and its format. The main missing piece is the relationship to get_bulk_results and the state the job must be in.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the lone task_id parameter is undocumented in the schema. The phrase 'del trabajo' implies task_id identifies the job whose leads are downloaded, which is a partial but not complete compensation — format, source of the id, and whether it is the enrichment job or a task id are left unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: produce a temporary link to download all leads from a job in JSON. The scope ('todos los leads del trabajo') is clear, but nothing distinguishes it from the adjacent get_bulk_results, which an agent could reasonably pick instead.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: download everything in bulk rather than paging through results. There is no statement of when to prefer this over get_bulk_results, nor any precondition such as the job having finished.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.