get_energy_prices
Retrieve current energy and bandwidth prices on the TRON blockchain to estimate transaction costs.
Instructions
Get current energy and bandwidth prices
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve current energy and bandwidth prices on the TRON blockchain to estimate transaction costs.
Get current energy and bandwidth prices
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as data freshness, caching, or rate limits. It adds minimal context beyond the tool's name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence. It is efficient but could benefit from additional structure (e.g., bullet points) for better readability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with no parameters, but the description lacks details on what precisely 'energy prices' entails (e.g., unit, time frame). Without output schema or annotations, it is minimally adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, the schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds meaning by specifying 'energy and bandwidth prices', which is sufficient for a parameterless tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the tool retrieves current energy and bandwidth prices, with a specific verb and resource. It is clearly distinguishable from sibling tools like get_trx_price or get_energy_consumption.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for obtaining current prices but offers no explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives. No exclusions or prerequisites provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Netts-official/tron_mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server