graphlens-mcp
# graphlens-mcp
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.Neko1313/graphlens-mcp -->
[](https://github.com/Neko1313/graphlens-mcp/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
[](https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/)
[](https://www.python.org/)
[](LICENSE)
A free, MIT-licensed [MCP](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) server that gives coding
agents (Claude Code, Cursor, and compatible clients) a **semantic code graph** of your
project โ symbols, cross-file calls, references, imports and cross-language boundaries.
Instead of reading files top-to-bottom or grepping for names, the agent **navigates the
structure**: *who calls this function*, *what does it depend on*, *what breaks if I change
its signature*. It is a thin runtime layer over the
[`graphlens`](https://github.com/Neko1313/graphlens) analysis engine: `graphlens` provides
the mechanisms (parsing, stable node identity, resolvers); `graphlens-mcp` owns the storage,
freshness and the agent-facing surface.
๐ **Documentation:** <https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/>
> Status: early. The core navigation works; see [Known limitations](#known-limitations).
## Why
Coding agents discover structure the slow way โ grep, glob, read one file at a time โ
rebuilding call paths by hand before the real work even starts. The motivation is the same
as every other code-context tool: **stop the agent from grepping.** The *approach* is what
sets `graphlens` apart.
Most tools answer this by building their **own** model of your code โ an ad-hoc graph
stitched from heuristics, where every tool maps the codebase a little differently and
nothing is authoritative. `graphlens` takes the opposite bet: it builds on the **language's
own real analysis engines** โ `rust-analyzer`, `gopls`, the TypeScript compiler, the bundled
`ty` type engine โ the LSP-grade tooling the industry already trusts. That yields a *stable,
real* picture of the project (who actually calls what, across files and languages), not a
bespoke approximation. And a stable foundation is something you can build on: attach context
to the parts of a change that matter, auto-extract semantic clusters, answer impact
questions reliably.
That foundation is the [`graphlens`](https://github.com/Neko1313/graphlens) engine โ
parsing, stable node identity, and the resolvers. **`graphlens-mcp` is a smart, agent-facing
layer over it**, and โ honestly โ a worked example of how to *use* the engine: it persists
the graph (so the whole thing isn't held in memory), adds a semantic + clustering layer on
top, keeps it fresh as you edit, and exposes it to agents as navigation tools plus a bundled
skill. From that example it is growing into a **self-sufficient system** โ one that, measured
against the market's giants, aims for **stable, reproducible** results: better in some places,
worse in others, but honest about which (see [How it compares](#how-it-compares)).
## How it compares
`graphlens-mcp` ships with a reproducible **A/B benchmark** ([`benchmarks/`](benchmarks/README.md))
that drives the same agent against three interchangeable code-context MCP servers โ
`graphlens`, `semble` (semantic search), and `codegraph` (graph index) โ plus a **no-tools
control** that measures how much each server adds over the model's own memory. It runs across
real **Go / Rust / Python / TypeScript** codebases and grades answers **deterministically
against oracle gold** (no LLM judge), stratified into SIMPLE lookups vs HARD impact /
cross-file questions, and reports accuracy **alongside** token / tool-call / dollar cost โ
because a cheaper arm at equal accuracy wins.
<!-- BENCHMARK-RESULTS:START -->
> ๐ **Results** (10 repos ยท 3 models, strong โ genuinely weak ยท ~2,400 graded runs โ
> full breakdown, significance tests and reproduction steps at
> [**docs: Benchmarks**](https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/benchmarks)):
>
> | | SIMPLE accuracy | HARD accuracy | HARD tokens (median) | HARD completion |
> |---|---|---|---|---|
> | **graphlens** | 0.980 โ 1.000 | 0.899 โ 0.921 | **22.4k โ 34.1k** | **โฅ 0.959 on every model** |
> | codegraph | 0.912 โ 0.990 | 0.655 โ 0.939 | 23.2k โ 70.0k | drops to 0.765 on the weakest model |
> | semble | 0.647 โ 0.961 | 0.555 โ 0.850 | 21.6k โ 74.9k | drops to 0.688 on the weakest model |
> | none (control) | 0.366 โ 0.681 | 0.453 โ 0.685 | 0.1k โ 0.9k | โ |
>
> Accuracy alone hides the number that matters to a bill: **tokens paid per task**. graphlens's
> HARD-tier token spend stays flat (22kโ34k) whether the driving model is strong or weak;
> codegraph's and semble's balloon past 70k on the weakest model โ more than double
> graphlens's ceiling โ for a *worse* answer, not a better one. graphlens is the only arm that
> stays clearly ahead of the no-tools control **and** keeps completion above 0.95 at every
> model tier: on the weakest model tested (gpt-oss-20b) it holds 0.900 HARD accuracy at
> roughly **half the token cost** of codegraph. Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (matched by
> task) confirm the gap is statistically significant on the weaker models, not an artifact of a
> few outlier tasks โ see the notebook for per-model p-values and effect sizes.
<!-- BENCHMARK-RESULTS:END -->
## Install
Requires **Python โฅ 3.13** (a constraint inherited from `graphlens`).
```bash
uv tool install graphlens-mcp # or: pipx install graphlens-mcp
```
Python language analysis works out of the box (the `ty` type engine ships as a
dependency). Other languages parse immediately and unlock full cross-file semantics once
their toolchain is present (Node for TypeScript, the Go toolchain, etc.); without it that
language is reported as `degraded` rather than blocking `init`.
## Quickstart (two commands)
```bash
uv tool install graphlens-mcp # 1. install
cd your-project && graphlens-mcp init # 2. index + configure your agent
```
`init` detects the project's languages, indexes the code into a local graph, writes the
MCP server entry into your agent's config and installs the navigation skill. You do **not**
run `serve` yourself โ your agent launches it from the config. Restart the agent and ask
it something like *"what breaks if I change the signature of `create_order`?"*.
## Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
| `graphlens-mcp init` | Detect languages โ toolchain doctor โ full index โ configure agents โ install skill |
| `graphlens-mcp serve` | Start the MCP server over stdio. **Launched by the agent**, not by you |
| `graphlens-mcp status` | Show detected languages, toolchain status, and graph size/freshness |
| `graphlens-mcp reindex` | Force a full rebuild (e.g. after installing a new toolchain) |
| `graphlens-mcp remove` | Deregister from agents and (with `--purge-db`) delete the local graph |
Useful `init` flags: `--root <dir>`, `--agent claude_code --agent cursor` (repeatable),
`--no-agent`, `--no-skills`, `--db <path>`.
The graph lives at `<project>/.graphlens/graph.db` (SQLite). It is a regenerable cache โ
safe to delete; `reindex` rebuilds it. Add `.graphlens/` to your VCS ignore (the bundled
`init` flow assumes it is not committed).
## Supported languages
| Language | Engine | Out-of-box |
|---|---|---|
| Python | `ty` (bundled) | Full semantics immediately |
| TypeScript | Node bridge | `degraded` without Node; full semantics with Node installed |
| Go | Go toolchain | `degraded` without toolchain |
| Rust | SCIP / rust-analyzer | `degraded` without toolchain |
| PHP | PHP parser | `degraded` without toolchain |
`graphlens-mcp status` reports the actual resolver status per language. When a toolchain is
missing, that language is reported as **degraded** (parsed structure, calls/types not fully
resolved) with an install hint โ it never blocks `init`.
## Agent tools
Three tools โ everything a symbol or file needs comes back as a navigable graph **node**,
not a dead grep line. Each response carries a graph-quality status (`ok` | `degraded`) so the
agent never mistakes a partial answer for a complete one, plus an `indexing` flag (`true`
when a background reindex is running, so edges may be temporarily incomplete).
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `search` | Find code by NAME, CONTENT, or MEANING โ **the one way in**. Returns graph nodes with their signature (often enough to answer without a follow-up call). Content is matched literally, not as a regex. Scope with `path_glob` (e.g. `"tests/*"`, `"*.ts"`, `"!tests/*"` to exclude a subtree); set `exhaustive=true` to list every matching file (no cap, no signatures) instead of the ranked top-N |
| `relations` | A symbol's neighbourhood in one call: callers, callees, implementors/subclasses, and non-call references โ each with its signature. **The** impact-analysis tool ("what breaks if I change X?", "what implements X?") |
| `info` | Read a specific target: a symbol (node id or name) โ source + signature + location; a file path โ its symbol outline |
`search` and `relations` accept either a symbol **name** or a node id directly โ you don't
need to look up a node id first. Both cap their response size (a large hit set is ranked by
relevance via a small bundled embedding model, not just truncated) and surface true counts
(`callers_total`, `references_total`, โฆ) when a list is capped, so the agent sees "15 shown
of 22" instead of guessing. If the embedding model can't be fetched (e.g. a first run with no
network), search transparently falls back to name/content matching.
## Freshness model
A single mechanism keeps the graph current: a **filesystem watcher** (`serve` starts it by
default; disable with `--no-watch`). When a file changes on disk the server re-indexes the
**connected set** โ the changed file plus the files that import it and the files it imports โ
with one full analyze, so cross-file edges are rebuilt correctly rather than left partial.
Deleting a file prunes its symbols and refreshes its importers. There is no polling and no
structure-only "skeleton" phase: every (re)index produces the full graph the resolver can
give. As a backstop, a tool that touches a file the watcher hasn't processed yet triggers the
same connected re-index on access.
Files created, deleted or edited *while the server was down* are invisible to an event-based
watcher, so `serve` runs a one-shot **reconcile** at startup: it scans the project, indexes
new files, prunes vanished ones, and refreshes any that changed โ then hands off to the
watcher.
## Known limitations
- **Connected-set re-link, deep ripples:** the watcher re-links the *connected set* of a
change (the changed file plus its direct importers and imports), not the entire project. A
rename that ripples through many indirection layers may need a full `reindex` for an exact
graph. Creating a file that an *unchanged* file already imports is handled โ a second
importer pass re-links that importer once the new file is indexed.
- **Cross-language edges on incremental edits:** synthesized `COMMUNICATES_WITH` edges are
re-synthesized for every boundary a re-indexed file touches, so a new or moved
exposer/consumer is linked without a full `reindex`. A change that leaves a boundary
entirely (a file that stops exposing an endpoint others still consume) may still need a
full `reindex` for an exact cross-language view; the boundary-based query resolves
connections regardless.
## Uninstall
`graphlens-mcp remove` deregisters the server from your agents; add `--purge-db` to also
delete the local `.graphlens/` cache.
## Development
```bash
uv sync --all-groups # install lint + test tooling
task check # ruff + format-check + ty + bandit + pytest (the CI gate)
task docs:serve # preview the docs site locally (needs Node + pnpm)
```
See the [Architecture](https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/architecture) and
[Semantic search](https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/design/semantic-search) pages on the
[documentation site](https://neko1313.github.io/graphlens-mcp/) for the design and invariants.
## License
MIT โ see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'search' finds code by various criteria, 'info' reads details of a specific target, and 'relations' explores a symbol's connections. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names are single lowercase words ('info', 'relations', 'search'), following a consistent and predictable style. Although not verb_noun, the pattern is uniform.
With exactly 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for code graph analysis. Each tool covers a fundamental operation (find, inspect, explore) without being too few or too many.
The tool surface covers the essential workflows for code navigation: searching for symbols, reading their details or file contents, and exploring relationships. No obvious gaps are present for the intended domain.