Skip to main content
Glama
NejcDvorsek

SolidWorks MCP

by NejcDvorsek

Related Servers

Alternatives to SolidWorks MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, measure, verify, and correct parametric SolidWorks parts and assemblies locally via the COM API, supporting operations like sketching, extruding, modeling, dimensioning, material assignment, export, and assembly mating.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive SolidWorks for parametric modelling, aerospace part generation, sheet metal, weldments, assemblies, drawings, simulation, inspection, and file export. It provides approval-gated operations, verification tools, and journaling for safe, recoverable design automation.
      94
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Let AI agents build, measure and verify parametric parts and assemblies in your own running SolidWorks (Windows, COM). 46 tools, every step measured.
      87
      674 PyPI
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents such as Claude to drive SolidWorks through its COM API using natural language, creating parts and assemblies, sketching geometry, and adding features without clicking menus. Also supports running arbitrary API scripts and verifying results through model reports, rendered views, interference checks, and exports.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a running SOLIDWORKS session through its COM API, with tools for sketching, feature creation, assemblies, and visual feedback via screenshots.
      22
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive desktop CAD software through natural language with verified execution, failure recovery, and traceable results across modeling, assemblies, drawings, exports, motion, FEA, and related engineering workflows.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 91 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools have distinct purposes, but the modeling surface contains several overlapping primitives: add_box/add_extruded_profile/add_disc, add_cylinder/add_cone/add_revolved_profile, add_swept_pipe/add_swept_profile, and add_sketch+extrude_sketch versus add_extruded_profile all require reading long descriptions to choose correctly. Other areas such as documents, mates, and drawings are clearer, so overlap is present but not pervasive.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are consistently snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (add_hole, cut_profile, list_features, set_dimension, check_interference). A few tools like swept_region, auto_layout, rebuild, export, screenshot, and run_script deviate from the verb_noun pattern but remain readable and predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 91 tools, this server is far beyond the typical 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ threshold for an extreme tool-count mismatch. Even for a broad CAD domain, the surface is large enough to burden tool selection and discovery.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong across part modeling, assemblies, mates, drawings, dimensions, equations, export, and mesh inspection, with detailed lifecycle support. Gaps remain around direct sketch editing, assembly component patterns, configurations, and mesh import, but many can be worked around via run_script.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues