telegraph_edit_account_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present. The description notes the optional parameter constraint but does not disclose other behavioral traits such as whether the update is immediate, if prior values are overwritten, or any permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with two sentences, front-loading the main purpose. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, yet description does not mention return values. For an update operation, some behavioral context is missing, but the operation is relatively simple.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little value beyond the schema. The constraint about at least one optional parameter is already evident from the schema (only access_token required). No additional semantic information provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it updates a Telegraph account, with a specific constraint about optional parameters. Distinguishes from create/delete tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides the constraint that at least one optional parameter must be provided, but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_account or get_account_info.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.