Skip to main content
Glama
Neel-XV

FastMCP MCP Server

by Neel-XV

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{
  "tasks": {
    "list": {},
    "cancel": {},
    "requests": {
      "tools": {
        "call": {}
      },
      "prompts": {
        "get": {}
      },
      "resources": {
        "read": {}
      }
    }
  }
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
addA

Add two numbers

fetch_pageA

Fetch the content of a web page as markdown using Jina Reader.

Args: url: The URL of the page to fetch.

search_docsB

Search FastMCP documentation for the given query.

Args: query: The search query.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool performs a unique, clearly defined function with no overlap between arithmetic, web fetching, and documentation search. An agent would have no difficulty selecting the appropriate tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names are short, lowercase, and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (fetch_page, search_docs). The lone exception is 'add', which is a bare verb, but it is still clear and consistent in style.

Tool Count4/5

With only 3 tools, the server is on the lighter side, but the small set is still reasonable for a general-purpose utility server. Each tool earns its place, though the collection feels somewhat sparse.

Completeness2/5

The tools are unrelated to a single coherent domain, making it difficult to assess what complete coverage would look like. There are no obvious lifecycle operations (e.g., update or delete) and the set appears to be a collection of unconnected utilities, leaving significant gaps for any specific purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues