list_reports
List your existing competitive intelligence reports with an optional limit on the number returned.
Instructions
List previously generated intelligence reports.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max reports |
List your existing competitive intelligence reports with an optional limit on the number returned.
List previously generated intelligence reports.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max reports |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states the action, omitting details like pagination, sorting, or whether archived reports are included.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficiently captures purpose. However, could incorporate more behavioral context without significant length increase.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list with one parameter, but lacks details on return format, ordering, or whether the list includes reports from all users. No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the limit parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond 'Max reports' in the parameter schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List previously generated intelligence reports' clearly states the action (list) and the resource (reports), distinguishing it from siblings like generate_report and list_competitors.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search or filter. No mention of prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NearIQ/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server