send-post-request
Send POST requests to HTTP endpoints with custom headers and data for API testing.
Instructions
send the post request
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | ||
| data | No | ||
| headers | No | ||
| timeout | No |
Send POST requests to HTTP endpoints with custom headers and data for API testing.
send the post request
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | ||
| data | No | ||
| headers | No | ||
| timeout | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate it's not read-only (destructiveHint=false) but description adds no behavioral details like error handling, response format, or idempotency. Minimal context beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely brief but not concise in a helpful way—lacks essential information. Not front-loaded with key purpose or usage details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and no behavioral details, the description is severely incomplete. Does not equip agent to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage for 4 parameters (url, data, headers, timeout). Description does not explain their purpose, format, or constraints, leaving the agent without guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'send the post request' is a tautology, restating the tool name without specifying what sending a POST request actually does (e.g., creates resources, submits data). No distinction from sibling HTTP method tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings (send-get-request, send-put-request, etc.). No context on idempotency, side effects, or appropriate use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Naveen-Automation/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server