Jira MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Jira MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables headless Jira Cloud automation via MCP: create issues and subtasks, read and JQL-search issues, inspect agile boards and swimlanes, move issues through workflows, and add comments and attachments.522 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local MCP-based interaction with Jira Cloud, offering tools for issues, comments, transitions, worklogs, attachments, and user lookups while addressing gaps like attachment downloads, mention notifications, and multi-step status transitions.522 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceJira Cloud MCP server providing Jira-first tools for common workflows and full REST API coverage through a generic request tool.522 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceManages Atlassian Jira Cloud projects, issues, sprints, boards, worklogs, comments, and workflow transitions from MCP-compatible clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Jira Cloud instances. Enables issue management, JQL queries, project and sprint management, and batch operations via natural language interfaces.121 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with JIRA through MCP, providing 35 tools for issues, comments, transitions, projects, boards, sprints, epics, links, worklogs, versions, attachments, users, and fields.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 41 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but some overlap exists among board/sprint/issue-data retrieval tools (e.g., getJiraBoardIssueData vs searchJiraIssuesUsingJql) and version tools. Descriptions generally clarify boundaries well enough for an agent to select correctly.
Names mostly follow a verb + Jira + noun pattern (e.g., getJiraIssue, listJiraProjects, createJiraIssue). Minor deviations like uploadAttachmentToJiraIssue and searchJiraIssuesUsingJql break the pattern slightly but remain readable and predictable.
41 tools is heavy for a single MCP server and exceeds the 25+ threshold for being too many. Many operations could be consolidated (e.g., list/get/manage variants across issues, boards, and versions).
The surface covers broad read/write operations for issues, comments, worklogs, links, attachments, users, projects, versions, boards, sprints, filters, dashboards, and properties. However, delete operations are largely missing for issues, comments, worklogs, links, attachments, and boards/sprints/filters/dashboards, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.