Skip to main content
Glama
Nauti-Labs

clearance-mcp

by Nauti-Labs

Related Servers

Alternatives to clearance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides programmable spend limits and audit trails for AI agents to make payments from a dedicated wallet, preventing overspend and unauthorized transactions.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides human-in-the-loop approval for risky AI agent actions, with durable state and audit logs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      26 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct clearance lifecycle action or auxiliary operation: list, create, get, approve, deny, revoke, verify token, create key, and get usage. Approve and deny are related decisions but are clearly separated by intent and outcome. There is no meaningful overlap between tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent resource_action pattern such as clearances_list, clearances_create, keys_create, and usage_get. The only notable deviation is verify_token, which uses verb_noun ordering. The convention is still highly predictable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped set for a clearance approval workflow API. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation rather than duplicating functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The core clearance lifecycle is well covered: create, list, get, approve, deny, revoke, and token verification. API key management is only partially covered because keys can be created but not listed or revoked, and usage is limited to a single get operation. These are minor gaps rather than blockers for the primary clearance workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues