clearance-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clearance-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides programmable spend limits and audit trails for AI agents to make payments from a dedicated wallet, preventing overspend and unauthorized transactions.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides human-in-the-loop approval for risky AI agent actions, with durable state and audit logs.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to safely interact with a double-entry payments ledger, enforcing idempotency, policy-based access control, and human-in-the-loop approval for high-value actions.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access326 PyPI1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for AI agent identity and authorization. Create, verify, and manage agent identities with trust scores and scoped authorization tokens.27 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct clearance lifecycle action or auxiliary operation: list, create, get, approve, deny, revoke, verify token, create key, and get usage. Approve and deny are related decisions but are clearly separated by intent and outcome. There is no meaningful overlap between tools.
Most tools follow a consistent resource_action pattern such as clearances_list, clearances_create, keys_create, and usage_get. The only notable deviation is verify_token, which uses verb_noun ordering. The convention is still highly predictable overall.
Nine tools is a well-scoped set for a clearance approval workflow API. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation rather than duplicating functionality.
The core clearance lifecycle is well covered: create, list, get, approve, deny, revoke, and token verification. API key management is only partially covered because keys can be created but not listed or revoked, and usage is limited to a single get operation. These are minor gaps rather than blockers for the primary clearance workflow.