get_activity_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only states what data is returned, but does not disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. For a read tool, this is minimal burden but still incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. Every part adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite minimal annotations, the description lists example data types (pace, HR, power, segments) indicating scope. Output schema exists, so return values are defined elsewhere. Missing context like authentication or error handling, but acceptable for a simple get tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not elaborate on the activity_id parameter beyond implying it identifies an activity. No format or constraints are provided, adding little value beyond the parameter name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly indicates the tool returns a complete detail of an activity, including examples (pace, HR, power, segments). This distinguishes it from sibling list tools like get_recent_activities or get_garmin_activities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the name implies it's for a single activity, the description does not mention scope, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.