Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Kanban MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a local-first task board over stdio JSON-RPC so MCP-capable agents can list and create projects and tasks, atomically claim the next ready task with a lease, heartbeat, log progress, manage dependency graphs, and mark tasks done or failed with results. All state lives in a single local SQLite file, so no shell command assembly or external services are needed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, query, update, claim, hand off, and complete tasks on a local SQLite-backed, project-namespaced kanban board through stdio MCP tools, including filtering for ready/blocked/stale work and exchanging task attachments. It also lets agents list projects and manage statuses, ownership, and evidence without any server or accounts.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to track and coordinate project work through a shared SQLite ledger, including task plans, session ancestry, claims, work locations, blockers, and commits via MCP tools.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first task governance board for AI agents, enabling session registration, task creation, progress updates, and evidence reporting via MCP, with separation of agent claims and human acceptance.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local kanban board & harness for coding agents over MCP: agents claim and move tasks, read and write notes, and build Auto-code workflows, within per-folder permissions and an audit log.
      5 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map cleanly to distinct resource-action pairs, but kanban_update_ticket and kanban_move_ticket both allow moving tickets and updating completion summaries, which creates possible confusion. The two doc-link tools also have inverse orientations that could be mistaken for each other.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a mostly consistent kanban_verb_noun pattern, but kanban_column_top_ticket lacks a verb and find/search are used interchangeably. Overall, the convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 32 tools, the surface is heavy and exceeds the comfortable range for an agent to quickly select between operations. Many tools are individually reasonable, but the count feels bloated for a kanban server, especially with niche entries like kanban_list_scrum_values and kanban_get_batch.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD/lifecycle coverage exists for projects, columns, tickets, epics, doc links, and the staging lease. Notable gaps include no project update/delete, no doc-link removal, and no batch mutators, but agents can work around most of these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues