Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fdl-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets agents run free, keyless lead-leak audits on UK local service businesses — detecting form platforms and their outreach implications, checking whether phone numbers are tappable tel: links, comparing phone numbers across a site and free directories, screening website hygiene, and locating a business's own site. It also bundles these into a single full audit that returns a prioritised list of fixable issues alongside top local competitors.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      MCP server for website SEO + GEO analysis. Scan any URL to get scores across 5 categories (SEO, GEO, Performance, Security, Accessibility) with actionable fix recommendations. Enables AI coding assistants to audit websites and implement fixes autonomously.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A production-minded MCP server that enables autonomous website design and management, with resources, safe Git operations, validation, Playwright inspection, Vercel previews, and JSONL audit logging. It also provides specialized audit agents for design, SEO, performance, accessibility, conversion, diagnostics, and landing pages.
      78
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: auditing a single site, comparing two sites, checking AI visibility, viewing city stats, and generating redesign previews. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four of five tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_website, compare_websites, get_city_dashboard, generate_redesign_preview). 'ai_visibility_check' deviates from the verb-first convention, making it slightly inconsistent but still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With exactly 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for a website audit/analysis service. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle of website analysis: auditing, comparing, AI visibility, city-level aggregation, and redesign previews. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to fetch historical audits or manage saved reports), but the core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues