Skip to main content
Glama
NameetP

pdfmux

by NameetP
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to pdfmux

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pdf-mcp

      wesseltl
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Extracts text and tables from PDFs for AI agents via MCP, enabling structured data retrieval from invoices, reports, and statements.
      78 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • doc-intel MCP server

      avinashbadgu
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract structured data from PDFs with confidence scores and provenance, and to search, review, and correct documents via MCP tools, resources, and prompts.
      -
    • flexorch-mcp by flexorch

      flexorch-mcpofficial

      flexorch
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible agents to process documents, extract structured data, detect PII, and export LLM-ready datasets through natural language tool calls.
      8
      63 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    • MCP PDF

      rsp2k
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered extraction and analysis of PDF documents with 40+ specialized tools for text, tables, images, layout analysis, security assessment, and document intelligence. Supports both text-based and scanned PDFs with OCR capabilities.
      308 PyPI
      10
      MIT

    • Xberg MCP Server

      jamon8888
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that extracts clean text, tables, and structured data from documents, images, code, and audio files, supporting 97 formats with OCR, transcription, and code intelligence.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: metadata extraction, full conversion, quality analysis, batch processing, structured data extraction, streaming extraction, and verification. No two tools overlap in functionality, and descriptions guide selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_pdf_metadata, convert_pdf), but batch_convert reverses the order and extract_structured/extract_streaming use adjective noun after verb. This minor inconsistency lowers the score slightly.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools cover the core PDF extraction workflow—metadata, analysis, conversion, batch, structured extraction, streaming, and verification—without redundancy. The scope is well-balanced for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main PDF processing tasks (metadata, conversion, analysis, extraction, streaming, verification) but lacks basic operations like merging or splitting. For an extraction-focused server, the coverage is very good.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources