Skip to main content
Glama
Nafi-Jza

WebSearch MCP Server

by Nafi-Jza
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to WebSearch MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP MyZ Search

      kimmywork
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables web search across Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Google using Playwright automation, with tools for retrieving search results and extracting page text content.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • search-mcp

      antigravity-press
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables running web searches across multiple engines like Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo! JAPAN, and Brave via Playwright, with tools to fetch page content and manage browser profiles.
      5
      MIT

    • Web Research MCP Server

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform web searches via DuckDuckGo without API keys and automate browser tasks with headless Chromium. Supports multi-step research workflows that automatically search and extract content from multiple pages.
      7
      38 npm
      26 PyPI
      MIT

    • Web Search MCP

      pranavms13
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web searching through Google, DuckDuckGo, and Bing using a headless Chrome browser, returning structured results with titles, URLs, and snippets. Also supports fetching and extracting text content from any webpage.
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: open_browser for manual interaction, scrape for content extraction, search for web search, and youtube_transcript for YouTube transcripts. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is inconsistent: scrape and search are single verbs, open_browser follows verb_noun, while youtube_transcript uses noun_noun. This lack of a uniform pattern could confuse an agent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped. Each tool provides essential functionality for web research without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core web search, scraping, and transcript extraction, but lacks features like image search or search history. Still, it handles common workflows effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources