korea-health-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to korea-health-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to query Korean drug, DUR safety rules, and health supplement databases via MCP protocol.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Korean official statistics from KOSIS via natural language in MCP clients like Claude Desktop, wrapping the KOSIS OpenAPI for search, data retrieval, and metadata exploration.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and analyzing non-reimbursable medical treatment costs in South Korea using the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service API. Supports searching treatment codes, comparing hospital prices, regional statistics analysis, and finding cost-effective healthcare options.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Korean disease information and statistics from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) using Claude.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to query authoritative medical sources such as FDA, WHO, PubMed, RxNorm, and ClinicalTrials.gov for drug information, medical literature, health statistics, clinical guidelines, and pediatric resources through local MCP tools.96 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients like Claude Desktop to search, retrieve, and analyze Korean statistical data from KOSIS OpenAPI.1618 PyPI1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a specific resource and action: hospital search vs. hospital details, non-payment by region vs. by hospital, drug info vs. DUR safety, disease statistics, plus two clearly distinct meta-tools for discovery and execution. No overlapping purposes.
Domain tools consistently follow a 'kohealth_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., search_hospital, get_hospital_info, get_drug_dur). The two meta-tools (discover_tools, execute_tool) deviate from this pattern but are clearly named and serve a different function, so the inconsistency is minor.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped. It covers multiple health data domains (hospitals, non-payment, drugs, diseases) without unnecessary bloat, and each tool contributes meaningfully to the overall functionality.
The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage for the apparent domain: hospital search and detailed info, non-payment item lookup by region and hospital, drug search and DUR safety, and disease statistics. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to directly compare non-payment prices across multiple hospitals, but the existing search can partially achieve this.