korea-health-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to korea-health-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to query Korean drug, DUR safety rules, and health supplement databases via MCP protocol.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying Korean official statistics from KOSIS via natural language in MCP clients like Claude Desktop, wrapping the KOSIS OpenAPI for search, data retrieval, and metadata exploration.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and analyzing non-reimbursable medical treatment costs in South Korea using the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service API. Supports searching treatment codes, comparing hospital prices, regional statistics analysis, and finding cost-effective healthcare options.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Korean disease information and statistics from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) using Claude.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients like Claude Desktop to search, retrieve, and analyze Korean statistical data from KOSIS OpenAPI.161MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to query Korean public financial, economic, and statistical data (OpenDART, ECOS, KOSIS, and data.go.kr) via real API calls, providing factual answers instead of guesses.13-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a specific resource and action: hospital search vs. hospital details, non-payment by region vs. by hospital, drug info vs. DUR safety, disease statistics, plus two clearly distinct meta-tools for discovery and execution. No overlapping purposes.
Domain tools consistently follow a 'kohealth_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., search_hospital, get_hospital_info, get_drug_dur). The two meta-tools (discover_tools, execute_tool) deviate from this pattern but are clearly named and serve a different function, so the inconsistency is minor.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped. It covers multiple health data domains (hospitals, non-payment, drugs, diseases) without unnecessary bloat, and each tool contributes meaningfully to the overall functionality.
The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage for the apparent domain: hospital search and detailed info, non-payment item lookup by region and hospital, drug search and DUR safety, and disease statistics. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to directly compare non-payment prices across multiple hospitals, but the existing search can partially achieve this.