Skip to main content
Glama
NNNNzs

Server Status MCP Server

by NNNNzs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Server Status MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Linux MCP Server

      ahmedadan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Linux and macOS system administration, diagnostics, and troubleshooting, supporting remote SSH execution and multi-host management.
      Apache 2.0

    • vps-ops-mcp

      WillyV347
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for monitoring and managing long-running processes on a remote VPS via SSH, with tools for status, logs, record summaries, and arbitrary command execution.
      12 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-sysmon

      dragogargo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for system monitoring, enabling users to ask about CPU, memory, disk, network, and processes on their system.
      9
      3
      MIT

    • linux-mcp

      Mohabdo21
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Linux system monitoring MCP server that provides real-time information on CPU, memory, disk, network, processes, Docker, security, and more via MCP tools.
      69
      1
      MIT

    • server-monitor-mcp

      Call123X
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Server Monitor MCP is a Linux server inspection service with web backend and MCP interface. It allows you to manage SSH hosts and query server metrics via natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The two tools are nearly identical in purpose: both retrieve CPU, memory, and operational status. The only difference is 'remote' vs. unspecified server, which is ambiguous and likely to cause misselection, as an agent cannot reliably determine which tool to use without additional context.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_remote_server_status and get_server_status). The naming is clear and predictable, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Server Status' domain. A typical status monitoring system might include more operations like list_servers, start_server, or stop_server. The minimal toolset limits functionality and suggests incomplete coverage.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for server status management. It only provides read operations (get status) with no ability to list servers, modify states, or handle other common tasks like restarting or checking logs. This will likely cause agent failures when more comprehensive actions are needed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources