Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-FEISHU

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A microservice control plane server that integrates with Windsurf IDE by fetching API information from Eolink OpenAPI and exposing it as MCP resources, enabling seamless API integration and management in the development environment.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Feishu/Lark API integration, enabling AI agents to send messages, manage groups, create and edit documents and spreadsheets, and search knowledge bases.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for operating Feishu Docs, folders, and attachments, and sending notifications via custom bot webhooks. Enables AI assistants to automate document workflows in Feishu.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that enables LLMs to interact with Lark/Feishu services, currently supporting employee information queries via Lark's Contact API.
      12 npm
      3
      -

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves a specific defect link, while the other fetches a list of recently updated defects. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case naming. The naming is predictable and uniform across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a domain like defect management in Feishu. This minimal set lacks essential operations like creating, updating, or deleting defects, making it under-scoped.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for defect management. It only provides read-only access to defects (link and list), missing critical CRUD operations such as create, update, delete, or search, which will cause agent failures in handling defect workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues