Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agenthub-monitor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables creating and editing live, interactive dashboards with Vega-Lite charts via A2UI in MCP hosts, with dataset binding and reusable widgets.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local-first MCP interface for managing SQLite-backed projects, boards, and tickets, including metrics, epics, documentation links, run-history, and staging-lease coordination with completion summaries for done items.
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted operational dashboard and MCP server that catalogs runnable services and their operational context, offering a read-only MCP endpoint to list projects, service status, runbooks, and reconciliation context.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables orchestration of MCP tool calls through declarative YAML-defined directed graphs with data transformation, conditional routing, and observable execution flows.
      65 npm
      22
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    get_status and show_agenthub_monitor both surface the same pipeline state and could be confused at a glance, but they differ clearly in output form (structured JSON vs. rendered inline dashboard). trigger_action is distinct in that it only annotates state rather than reading it. The descriptions explicitly clarify these boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    get_status and trigger_action follow a clean verb_noun pattern, while show_agenthub_monitor bakes the server name into the noun (show_<server>_monitor). This is a minor deviation but still readable and predictable in intent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the thin side, but for a narrow monitor-and-annotate purpose each tool earns its place: read state, render dashboard, record an action request. No padding or redundant tools.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers reading and rendering state plus recording an action, but there is no way to clear or acknowledge a recorded action, and no per-node querying or filtering. These gaps leave agents at a dead end after triggering an action, though the core monitoring loop works.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues