agenthub-monitor
Related Servers
Alternatives to agenthub-monitor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables creating and editing live, interactive dashboards with Vega-Lite charts via A2UI in MCP hosts, with dataset binding and reusable widgets.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to render shadcn-styled dashboards, forms, charts, and comparisons in a local browser via MCP tools.8 npm2-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides a local-first MCP interface for managing SQLite-backed projects, boards, and tickets, including metrics, epics, documentation links, run-history, and staging-lease coordination with completion summaries for done items.32MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local, model-independent DAG task coordinator for AI coding agents, with a static visual UI, validated state machine, resumable JSON progress, and MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted operational dashboard and MCP server that catalogs runnable services and their operational context, offering a read-only MCP endpoint to list projects, service status, runbooks, and reconciliation context.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables orchestration of MCP tool calls through declarative YAML-defined directed graphs with data transformation, conditional routing, and observable execution flows.65 npm22MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
get_status and show_agenthub_monitor both surface the same pipeline state and could be confused at a glance, but they differ clearly in output form (structured JSON vs. rendered inline dashboard). trigger_action is distinct in that it only annotates state rather than reading it. The descriptions explicitly clarify these boundaries.
get_status and trigger_action follow a clean verb_noun pattern, while show_agenthub_monitor bakes the server name into the noun (show_<server>_monitor). This is a minor deviation but still readable and predictable in intent.
Three tools is on the thin side, but for a narrow monitor-and-annotate purpose each tool earns its place: read state, render dashboard, record an action request. No padding or redundant tools.
The surface covers reading and rendering state plus recording an action, but there is no way to clear or acknowledge a recorded action, and no per-node querying or filtering. These gaps leave agents at a dead end after triggering an action, though the core monitoring loop works.