The two tools are a clean read/write pair: recall searches memory while record writes to it. There is no plausible way to confuse them, and their descriptions reinforce the distinction.

Both tools use the identical `cogvault_` prefix followed by a single clear verb (recall, record). The pattern is perfectly predictable and readable.

Two tools is a thin surface even for a focused memory store; the domain of persistent memory naturally invites a few more operations. It is defensible as a minimal core, but sits below the well-scoped 3-15 range.

The server covers create and read but has no update, delete/forget, or list operations, leaving common memory-lifecycle tasks (correcting a stale fact, removing sensitive data) as dead ends. Core recall/record workflows do work.