Skip to main content
Glama
N0moreher0
by N0moreher0

Related Servers

Alternatives to venira-mcp-coding

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to safely read, search, understand, and edit local project code and files, with Git inspection, code indexing, and controlled command execution within permissioned workspaces.
      4 npm
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform workspace-confined file operations, read-only Git inspection, and structured shell commands, while requiring out-of-band human approval for mutations and external executions and maintaining an audit trail.
      14
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to safely inspect and modify project files within explicitly allowed workspace roots, with controls for file operations, git status/diff, and optionally allowlisted command execution.
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely inspect, modify, and manage local projects with trusted filesystem access, safe Git operations, controlled task execution, and developer runtime process management over stdio or HTTP.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to list, read, inspect, write, and precisely edit files and to regex-search a workspace, with every path confined to a sandboxed root directory. Token-saving output such as line-range reads and match locations without line content keeps context use low while guarded writes and ambiguous edits prevent accidental data loss.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to develop within a local project workspace by reading and modifying files, running commands and tests, checking Git state, and persisting progress as history sessions that can be restored in later conversations.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clear purpose statements, but there are genuine overlaps: project_create vs project_create_directory vs project_write_file, and project_outline_symbol vs project_file_symbols do nearly the same single-file symbol scan. Search-family tools (project_search, project_selective_search, project_plan_read_batch, project_symbol_references) are differentiated only by fairly subtle description language, which risks misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent project_ prefix and snake_case, and most are verb_noun (project_read_file, project_create_directory, project_pr_merge). A handful deviate to noun-only or unusual forms (project_health, project_snapshot, project_secret, project_install_self, project_create), but the pattern remains readable throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    40 tools is heavy for a coding assistant surface, and many are micro-variants (read_file / read_ranges / read_batch / plan_read_batch, outline_symbol / file_symbols, search / selective_search). While each has a rationale, the surface exceeds what an agent can reliably select from without explicit guidance.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: file CRUD, shell lifecycle, search, symbols, CI trigger/status/logs, full PR lifecycle (list, create, comment, merge, close, reopen), secrets, snapshots, audit and health. Minor gaps exist — no native git commit/push, no PR review-approval or issue tools — but shell and PR tools provide workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues