Skip to main content
Glama
MyronKoch

XRP Ledger Testnet MCP Server

by MyronKoch
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to XRP Ledger Testnet MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • xrpl mcp

      RomThpt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      CP server that provides integration with the XRP Ledger. The server allows AI assistants to access account information, transaction history, and network data on the XRP Ledger, with capabilities for querying ledger objects, submitting transactions, and monitoring the network.
      9 npm
      13
      MIT

    • xrpl

      burnxrp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, validate, and submit ledger-native XRPL transactions against public nodes — escrows, XRP and token payments, DEX/AMM swaps and liquidity, issuer clawback, and x402 pay-per-request — with validated-ledger proof of results. State-changing calls go to the account owner for browser signing, while an owner-funded agent account allows autonomous spending bounded by on-ledger balance and local policy limits.
      MIT

    • xrpl-mcp-service

      tedlikeskix
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing comprehensive access to the XRP Ledger (XRPL). This service enables AI models to interact with XRPL through standardized endpoints.
      4
      -

    • --

      eamwhite1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      --
      56 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have nearly identical purposes, such as send_token vs transfer_token, get_wallet_info vs get_account_info, get_chain_info vs get_network_info, and get_gas_price vs estimate_fees. Even with descriptions, these overlaps make it difficult for an agent to reliably pick the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same xrp_ prefix with snake_case and a consistent verb_noun structure (e.g., xrp_create_escrow, xrp_finish_escrow, xrp_cancel_escrow). No mixing of conventions, making the naming highly predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 51 tools, the server is overstuffed. Many tools are redundant variants of the same operation (e.g., send_token/transfer_token, mint_nft/mint_nft_with_ipfs), inflating the count without adding genuine functionality. A leaner set would be more effective.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers major XRP Ledger areas (wallets, transactions, escrow, DEX, NFTs, tokens), but missing key operations like AMM creation/swapping, payment channels, and checks. The redundancy doesn't address these gaps, leaving notable holes in advanced functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources