XRP Ledger Testnet MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to XRP Ledger Testnet MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCP server that provides integration with the XRP Ledger. The server allows AI assistants to access account information, transaction history, and network data on the XRP Ledger, with capabilities for querying ledger objects, submitting transactions, and monitoring the network.9 npm13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with XRP Ledger blockchain for managing wallets, creating and trading tokens, minting and managing NFTs, and executing DEX trades through 15+ comprehensive tools.7 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing comprehensive access to the XRP Ledger (XRPL). This service enables AI models to interact with XRPL through standardized endpoints.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely execute peer-to-peer tasks on the XRP Ledger by locking payment in escrow, submitting proof of completion, and receiving an objective PASS/FAIL judgement from an independent AI referee.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA bridge that enables AI models like Claude and GPT to access XRP Ledger data and functionality through a standardized API interface.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Plasma Network blockchain testnet, supporting XPL token transfers, transaction monitoring, gas estimation, wallet balance queries, and smart contract interactions through natural language.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 51 tools
Several tools have nearly identical purposes, such as send_token vs transfer_token, get_wallet_info vs get_account_info, get_chain_info vs get_network_info, and get_gas_price vs estimate_fees. Even with descriptions, these overlaps make it difficult for an agent to reliably pick the right tool.
All tool names follow the same xrp_ prefix with snake_case and a consistent verb_noun structure (e.g., xrp_create_escrow, xrp_finish_escrow, xrp_cancel_escrow). No mixing of conventions, making the naming highly predictable.
With 51 tools, the server is overstuffed. Many tools are redundant variants of the same operation (e.g., send_token/transfer_token, mint_nft/mint_nft_with_ipfs), inflating the count without adding genuine functionality. A leaner set would be more effective.
The toolset covers major XRP Ledger areas (wallets, transactions, escrow, DEX, NFTs, tokens), but missing key operations like AMM creation/swapping, payment channels, and checks. The redundancy doesn't address these gaps, leaving notable holes in advanced functionality.