Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Osmosis MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that enables LLMs to interact with the Osmosis protocol, allowing for querying and transaction functionality through natural language.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with BNB Chain, opBNB, and other EVM networks through natural language. It provides tools for DeFi trading, DEX swaps, smart contract deployment, token operations, security analysis, and market data across multiple blockchain networks.
      22 npm
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with 30+ Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks, supporting token transfers, smart contract interactions, and ENS name resolution through a unified interface.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides onchain tools for AI applications to interact with the Hashkey Network, enabling cryptocurrency transfers, smart contract deployment, and blockchain interactions.
      13 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 161 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set covers many distinct operations (e.g., get-pool-info vs. get-cl-pool-liquidity), but there is significant overlap in 'get' tools that could confuse agents. For example, get-pool-incentives and get-cl-pool-incentives are similar but for different pool types, and many 'get-' tools query related data (e.g., get-pool-spot-price vs. get-twap) with subtle distinctions that may lead to misselection without careful reading of descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., get-account-balance, create-pool, prepare-swap-transaction), which is predictable. However, there are minor deviations like 'multi-send' (adjective-noun) and 'stable-swap' (adjective-noun) that break the verb-first convention, and a few tools like 'price-to-tick' and 'tick-to-price' use a different structure, slightly reducing consistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 161 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, making it overwhelming and difficult for agents to navigate efficiently. While Osmosis is a complex blockchain with many features, this many tools likely includes redundant or overly granular operations (e.g., multiple 'get-' queries for similar data) that could be consolidated, indicating poor scoping and a heavy cognitive load.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of the Osmosis blockchain domain, including liquidity pools (creation, swapping, exiting), staking, governance, IBC, token factory, smart contracts, and queries. It supports full CRUD/lifecycle operations (e.g., create-pool, get-pool-info, set-pool-weights, prepare-exit-pool) and addresses all major functionalities without obvious gaps, ensuring agents can handle complex workflows effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues