Skip to main content
Glama
Myestery

Browser CDP MCP Server

by Myestery

Related Servers

Alternatives to Browser CDP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables direct browser control via Chrome DevTools Protocol, supporting navigation, interaction, content extraction, and screenshots through a single MCP tool.
      1
      357
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control Chrome/Edge browsers via CDP, including page navigation, element interaction, snapshots, network debugging, script execution, and performance tracing.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading browser DevTools data (tabs, console errors, network requests, screenshots, DOM, CSS, JS execution) via Chrome DevTools Protocol.
      4,506 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets coding agents control and inspect a live Chrome browser for reliable automation, in-depth debugging, and performance analysis. Provides access to Chrome DevTools capabilities such as tracing, network inspection, screenshots, and console messages through MCP clients.
      1,060,392 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: cdp_send appears to send commands to the Chrome DevTools Protocol, close_browser terminates the browser session, get_url retrieves the current URL, and screenshot captures a visual snapshot. There is no overlap in functionality between these tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: cdp_send uses a prefix-based convention, while close_browser, get_url, and screenshot follow a verb_noun pattern. This inconsistency reduces predictability, but all names are still readable and descriptive of their functions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a browser automation server, lacking common operations like navigation, clicking, or input handling. However, the tools cover basic session management and inspection, making it borderline appropriate for minimal use cases.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for browser automation: it lacks essential actions like navigate, click, type, or evaluate JavaScript, and there is no coverage for interacting with page elements or handling events. This will cause significant agent failures in typical browsing tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues