aw1-circuit-breaker
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| intercept_tool_callB | |
| analyze_code_astA | |
| get_circuit_breaker_telemetryB | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a recognizable role: get_circuit_breaker_telemetry reads status, intercept_tool_call gates a runtime execution, and analyze_code_ast performs static analysis. However, intercept_tool_call and analyze_code_ast overlap, since both inspect payloads and both return detected AST primitives/risk, so an agent may hesitate between them.
All three names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_..., intercept_..., analyze_...). The convention is predictable and readable across the set.
Three tools is at the low end but reasonable for a focused circuit breaker: status, enforcement, and analysis. It is slightly thin, with no tools for adjacent concerns like policy management or audit history.
The core inspect/enforce/observe lifecycle is covered, but the telemetry tool references 'active defense policies' and 'containment layers' with no tool to list, create, or update those policies, and there is no audit/decision-log retrieval. These are notable gaps for a security-gateway domain.