Skip to main content
Glama
Muslinmin

bunpro-mcp

by Muslinmin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to bunpro-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • srs-mcp

      happymario123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides spaced-repetition scheduling with the SM-2 algorithm as MCP tools, enabling agents to manage review items like flashcards or vocab locally. It supports adding, grading, and listing due items, plus optional pro features for export and forecast.
      6
      MIT

    • japanese-learning-memory

      hinoyayoi
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that helps you maintain a personal Japanese learning knowledge base, including vocabulary, confusion relations, mistakes, and spaced-repetition reviews. It provides tools and prompts for managing and reviewing your Japanese learning data without calling external LLM APIs.
      6
      -

    • bunpro-mcp

      PatVandyke
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An unofficial MCP server for Bunpro that exposes its review queue, search, statistics, and SRS management as tools, enabling an LLM agent to read study data and add grammar points or vocabulary to reviews.
      23
      2 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: adding items, getting specific items, obtaining practice pools, getting review queues, importing/exporting, and submitting grades. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_item, get_item, get_practice_pool). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Japanese SRS system. It covers the essential operations without being overly large or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core workflows: adding, retrieving, reviewing, practicing, grading, and import/export. Missing explicit update/delete tools is a minor gap, but the import/export can handle bulk changes, and the overall surface is satisfactory.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources