Skip to main content
Glama
MukundaKatta

agentvet-mcp

by MukundaKatta
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to agentvet-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tool-smith

      ganlin770
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that routes natural language requests to structured tool calls using a LoRA-tuned small language model, with built-in validation, retry, and fallback recovery.
      MIT

    • Schema Sentinel

      SanjoyDat1
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that validates tool calls against JSON Schema, performs deterministic repair, redacts secrets, and maintains a hash-chained audit ledger.
      -

    • MCP Spectral

      mark-sivill
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that wraps Spectral to lint OpenAPI specifications, enabling LLMs to validate and fix API definitions.
      1
      MIT

    • Echo MCP

      ZenlixAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight server that enables AI agents to emit and validate structured messages through MCP tool call returns. It facilitates reliable programmatic consumption of agent outputs by echoing validated payloads against predefined schemas.
      8
      MIT

    • mcp-openapi-schema

      hannesj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A MCP server that exposes OpenAPI schema information to LLMs like Claude. This server allows an LLM to explore and understand large OpenAPI schemas through a set of specialized tools, without needing to load the whole schema into the context
      48 npm
      49
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: generating retry messages, linting tool definitions, and validating tool args. There is no overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (generate_retry_message, lint_tool_definition, validate_tool_args), making them predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of agent vetting and validation. Each tool earns its place without being too sparse or bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core validation, linting, and feedback generation. A minor gap is the absence of a tool to suggest fixes or re-lint after changes, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources