mailosaur_servers_get
Retrieve a Mailosaur server by its unique ID to access its configuration and settings.
Instructions
Get a Mailosaur server by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Server ID. |
Retrieve a Mailosaur server by its unique ID to access its configuration and settings.
Get a Mailosaur server by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Server ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations; description only says 'Get by ID'. Does not disclose what happens on errors (e.g., invalid ID), authentication needs, or that it's read-only.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no waste. Could be more informative without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool (1 param, no output schema). Description covers purpose and key parameter, but lacks return value or error info.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'Server ID.' Baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get), the resource (Mailosaur server), and the identifier method (by ID). It distinguishes from siblings like list or create.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., list, search). The context of 'by ID' implies use when ID is known, but not explicitly stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MrNewDelhi/mailosaur-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server