catastro_completar_parajes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well by disclosing key behaviors: it is resumable, skips entries that already have a record, respects a daily limit, and can be relaunched. This gives the agent a realistic picture of the tool's side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences effectively front-load the main action and then provide essential resumability details. There is no redundant text or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core workflow and operational limits (resumability, daily cap), but it omits parameter semantics and return/error behavior. Given the tool's specialized batch nature, this is a strong but not perfect completion.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description only clarifies the 'rcs' parameter (list of RCs). The other parameters (municipio, municipio_mun, provincia_del) remain unexplained, forcing the agent to guess their formats and purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: iterate over a list of RCs and fill in missing 'paraje' via the official source, with a limiter. This distinctly sets it apart from sibling tools that query, download, or search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context for use (batch completion of missing parajes) and explains resumability and the daily cap, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.