A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write a local-first knowledge base of plain markdown files in git, with governance gates for safe, hash-anchored edits.
1
Apache 2.0
okf-hub
by Movida
Related Servers
Alternatives to okf-hub
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude to maintain a team knowledge base stored as markdown in a GitHub repository, with tools for search, edit, linking, and interactive views.2 npm2AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coordinating Claude Code and Codex across separate Git worktrees with shared issue ownership, file reservations, messages, and explicit handoffs.514 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns Claude Code into an engineering project manager by orchestrating feature development with isolated Git worktrees, structured task validation, and approval-gated integration.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects claude.ai to a private GitHub repo of markdown files as a personal second brain, providing guarded read and write tools for knowledge management.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceCoordinates parallel Claude Code agents on shared repositories and orchestrates multiple Claude subscriptions, enabling live session handoff, conflict detection, and remote terminal control.5 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct hub operation: listing bases, searching a corpus, reading documents, retrieving governance rules, submitting proposals, and rescaming the hub. There is no meaningful overlap between the six tools.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the kb_ prefix and use snake_case, and five of six follow a clear verb-first pattern. kb_governance is the only noun-style name, but it still fits the overall naming scheme without causing confusion.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is a well-scoped size for a knowledge-base hub: discovery, reading, searching, governance, contribution, and maintenance each have a dedicated tool. No tool feels redundant or unnecessary.
Completeness4/5
The core workflows are covered: exploring bases, reading documents, checking governance rules, and submitting proposals are all supported. The main gap is that proposal resolution is not visible through the MCP tools, and base creation happens outside the hub via git, but these are documented limitations rather than fatal omissions.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues