Skip to main content
Glama
Mostov82

Conducted MCP

by Mostov82
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Conducted MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ForgeSwarm

      H2SO4620
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that turns independent AI agents into a coordinated engineering team with shared task board, context, review loop, and enforced plan-implement-review-iterate workflow.
      24
      MIT

    • portuni

      honzapav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a shared graph of an organization's projects, processes, areas, and principles, enabling consistent context for tools and AI agents.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • Arthur

      moechehabb
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables developers to summon AI development team agents directly from their IDE to help with tasks like PR reviews, security evaluation, and CI/CD deployment setup.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct function within the methodology: decision logging, gate evaluation, kickoff planning, interview questions, procedure guidance, standup detection, and artifact validation. There is no overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case consistently. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (evaluate_gate, validate_artifact), with minor exceptions like 'next_procedure' and 'standup_due'. The pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    7 tools is well-scoped for the domain of a development methodology. Each tool covers an essential aspect: kickoff, gates, decisions, standups, artifact validation, and general procedure. Neither too few nor too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core methodology lifecycle: kickoff, decision logging, gate evaluation, standup detection, artifact validation, and procedure guidance. Missing direct creation tools for some artifacts (beyond kickoff plan), but validation and guidance are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources