Skip to main content
Glama
README.md
# 🌙 Nightshift

**The on-call data team that gets smarter every night.**

[Live demo](https://nightshift.51-91-121-153.sslip.io) · [Break it yourself](https://try.nightshift.51-91-121-153.sslip.io) · [JUDGING.md (60s)](JUDGING.md) · [How we win](docs/WIN.md) · [Submit pack](docs/SUBMIT.md) · [Upstream PR datahub-skills#126](https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub-skills/pull/126) · [Apache 2.0](LICENSE)

**try.*** is the judge sandbox (break / wake / restore on a real graph). **/app** is the connected war room (your DataHub, Sentinel, history). Same agent loop; different entry. The dbt **demo PR** is a real draft fix the agent opened ([nightshift-dbt-demo#3](https://github.com/Mossab28/nightshift-dbt-demo/pull/3)) - proof of “agents that do real work,” not a screenshot.

![Nightshift landing](docs/media/landing.png)

At 2:47am an upstream team renames a column and tells nobody. By 9:07am the
revenue dashboard reads zero, and Finance notices before the data team does.
Nightshift takes that pager: a Claude agent wired into your
[DataHub](https://datahubproject.io) graph works the incident like a senior
engineer, and then does the thing humans never have time to do at 4am: **it
writes down what it learned, inside the graph itself.**

The second time a pipeline breaks the same way, Nightshift does not
investigate. It remembers. **An investigation becomes a lookup.**

![War room: one night of on-call work on one page](docs/media/warroom.png)

## The night, in numbers

Measured on DataHub's showcase-ecommerce datapack (1,049 entities), from the
replayable shift reports in [`examples/shift-reports/`](examples/shift-reports/)
(wall-clock shift length + investigation tool calls counted in those reports):

| | Night 1 (cold) | Night 3 (memory) |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation tool calls | 14 | 5, including exactly the 2 reads memory prescribed |
| Shift wall-clock | 2.2 min | 1.1 min |
| Lineage re-walked | full path | none |

By night 3 the agent recognized a recurrence, reframed the incident from a SQL
problem to a process problem, escalated to the model's owner, and proposed a
dbt source test so CI would block the regression. See the real draft PR:
[nightshift-dbt-demo#1](https://github.com/Mossab28/nightshift-dbt-demo/pull/1).

## Architecture

```mermaid
flowchart LR
 P([📟 the pager]) --> A

 subgraph agent [Nightshift agent (Claude)]
 A[1 RECALL] --> B[2 LINEAGE]
 B --> C[3 DIAGNOSE<br/>one root cause]
 C --> D[4 REMEMBER]
 D --> E[5 FIX PR<br/>draft]
 end

 subgraph dh [DataHub OSS]
 M[(the graph remembers<br/>postmortems · tags · guards)]
 end

 A -- "recall_incident_memory" --> N
 B -- "search · schemas · lineage + SQL" --> O[datahub MCP server<br/>official, reads]
 D -- "incidents · assertions · memory" --> N[nightshift MCP server<br/>ours, writes]
 O --> M
 N --> M
 E --> R([☀️ the morning report])
```

The official `mcp-server-datahub` covers the read surface completely. It has
no write surface for the on-call loop: no incidents, no assertions, no
memory. The Nightshift MCP server is that missing write surface, built on the
OSS GraphQL API and metadata model, and
[upstreamed as a skill PR](https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub-skills/pull/126)
(plus a [packaging bug report](https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub/issues/19028)
found along the way). Full detail in [docs/architecture.md](docs/architecture.md).

## What the agents leave behind

Open the DataHub UI after a shift and every conclusion is already there, in
the surfaces your team uses today:

- **The incident**, raised *and resolved in DataHub* (`open_incident` / `resolve_incident`).
- **The postmortem**, written into the dataset's documentation (prose for the human at 9am).
- **A machine-readable memory**, a structured property in JSON, for the next agent.
- **A searchable failure-mode tag** for everyone, via `find_datasets_with_failure_mode`.
- **A column-presence assertion** on the field that broke, visible in the
 Validations tab (`guard_column`). Honest scope: it marks that the column
 exists in the catalog; value-level checks (not-null / sum > 0) stay a
 follow-up for dbt tests / CI.
- **A concrete fix**: a dbt change built from the columns the catalog actually
 holds: [a real draft PR](https://github.com/Mossab28/nightshift-dbt-demo/pull/1).

Nightshift itself is stateless. The memory lives in DataHub aspects, so it
survives restarts and model changes, and any MCP-capable agent pointed at the
same graph inherits it.

## One incident, whole-graph immunization

When a shift closes, Nightshift asks the graph one more question: *where else
does this exact exposure exist?* `immunize_graph` finds every dataset carrying
the same column, across platforms, and leaves an idempotent presence guard
on each one. On the demo graph that is about **10 datasets** over dbt, Looker,
PowerBI, S3 and Postgres in a single call: datasets that never broke get the
same Validations marker from an incident they never had.

## The Sentinel

Nobody presses the button. The Sentinel fingerprints the schema of every
watched dataset on an interval. When a column moves (renamed, dropped, or
retyped), it names the drift and wakes the night shift itself
(`trigger: sentinel`). The loop closes without a human pager at all.

## Authority boundaries

- **Agent may write** (Nightshift MCP): incidents, documentation, structured
 memory, failure tags, column-presence EXTERNAL assertions, draft fix PR.
- **Still human:** merge the PR, value-level tests, production deploy.
- **Memory lives in DataHub aspects**, not in chat history. Nightshift is
 stateless; the graph remembers across nights and model changes.
- Presence guards assert the column exists in the catalog. They are not
 value-level quality tests (not-null / sum > 0 stay in dbt / CI).

Claims in this README are gated by `python scripts/verify_judging_evidence.py`.

## Quick start

Prerequisites: Docker with ~8 GB of memory, and either an authenticated
`claude` CLI or an `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`.

```bash
make up datapack # DataHub + a realistic 1,049-entity enterprise graph
make setup # install Nightshift
make demo # silently break the pipeline, hand the agent the pager
```

**If `datahub datapack` fails on a fresh PyPI install of `acryl-datahub` 1.7.0**
(missing resource file), that is
[datahub#19028](https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub/issues/19028).
Workaround until the fix lands: install the CLI from the DataHub repo
(`pip install -e ./metadata-ingestion` from a clone) or use a build that
still ships the datapack assets, then re-run `make datapack`.

`make demo` renames an upstream column, tells nobody, and prints the morning
report when the shift ends. `nightshift war-room` renders the night as a
single dark page. Replayable shift reports and postmortems live in
[`examples/`](examples/).

## Built on

The [DataHub MCP Server](https://github.com/acryldata/mcp-server-datahub) and
the DataHub Agent Context Kit. Nightshift adds the write surface OSS agents
were missing and gives it back upstream.

## License

[Apache 2.0](LICENSE)

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a unique role in the incident lifecycle: recall memory, search failures, open/resolve incidents, guard columns, and write conclusions. No overlap in purpose or action.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., recall_incident_memory, open_incident, guard_column). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is ideal for an incident response server: enough to cover the full workflow without redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full incident lifecycle from recall to prevention to memory. Minor gaps like updating an incident or listing open incidents exist, but the core flow is complete.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues