Skip to main content
Glama
Moreti2002

Polymath MCP

by Moreti2002

Related Servers

Alternatives to Polymath MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Zero-auth multi-source research MCP server that enables web search, reading URLs, PDFs, GitHub repos, and querying Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Semantic Scholar, and YouTube transcripts without API keys.
      45 PyPI
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      SERP-free scholarly search MCP server that queries academic sources like arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and conference proceedings using official APIs and reverse-engineered endpoints, with no API keys required. It supports unified conference search and returns normalized paper metadata.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP-native research assistant — search backend, intent-routing, and writing pipeline that carries a question through search, verification, and writing, delivering whatever research you need: quick answers, verified sources, or a finished document.
      2
      7
      94 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by domain (papers, code, models, trends, components, standards). Minor ambiguity exists between search_components and search_trends, as both can surface component-related information, though one focuses on datasheets and the other on discussions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The majority of tools follow a consistent search_<domain> pattern (search_papers, search_code, search_hub, search_trends, search_components, search_standards). The remaining tools use clear verb_noun forms (get_paper, list_sources) that fit naturally without mixing conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its multi-domain research purpose. Each tool serves a distinct need in the discovery pipeline, and the count is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core discovery lifecycle: searching papers, retrieving paper details, searching code, models/datasets, trends, components, and standards. Missing are detail-retrieval tools for non-paper entities (e.g., get_code, get_model), but search results appear to include sufficient information for most use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues