Skip to main content
Glama
MorenoLand

Moreno.Jev

by MorenoLand

Related Servers

Alternatives to Moreno.Jev

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding or reasoning agents to request structured judgments from TypeSafe's Jev model at decision points, including choices, scores, claim verification, and code reviews, with probabilities and confidence returned as data.
      5
      173 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to call typed code-review and content-moderation decision tools, returning structured verdicts, probabilities, and confidence-gated actions.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query files, logs, and search results through TypeSafe Jev's typed, probabilistic answers, so they retrieve only the needed conclusion instead of raw context. Supports classification, scoring, yes/no checks, extraction, page ranking, and injection screening.
      11
      1,141 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents and CI with a typed decision layer that sends bounded state and questions to Jev, then returns deterministic actions for review, risk assessment, requirement checks, and verification.
      9
      1,141 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are distinguished by their input type: code, diff, test output, bug report, hypothesis, or generic state. However, jev_evaluate is broad and could overlap conceptually with any of the specialized review tools, creating some ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent jev_ prefix and snake_case, with most following a verb_noun pattern (review_code, review_diff, check_hypothesis). jev_evaluate is a minor deviation because it lacks a noun target.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a focused code-review and triage assistant. Each tool covers a distinct input type and earns its place without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers common triage scenarios: code, diffs, test logs, bug reports, hypotheses, and generic evaluation. Minor gaps exist for specialized reviews like security or dependency analysis, but the generic evaluate tool can partially compensate.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues