exit1-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to exit1-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Uptrack uptime monitoring. Manage monitors and incidents from AI agents like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor.13 npmMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing self-hosted Uptime Kuma monitors and querying uptime statistics from Claude.-

Drumbeats MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Drumbeats monitoring. Enables creating monitors, triaging incidents, and running HTTP/SSL/DNS checks using natural language from any AI client.19108 npm2Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Uptime Kuma that enables monitoring and management of uptime monitors, heartbeats, notifications, tags, and maintenance windows via natural language.35619 npm64MIT

uptimepageofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Uptimepage uptime monitoring. An LLM client can read your monitors and incidents, run a check on demand, and post incident updates. Writes need an OAuth login and a scoped token, and each one is logged.54AGPL 3.0- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for StillOnline uptime monitoring, enabling management of projects, checks, incidents, and public status pages through natural language.1058 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions explicitly steer between look-alikes (toggle_check vs delete_check, send_test_alert vs alert config). The one fuzzy cluster is the three read tools on a single check (get_check, get_check_history, get_check_stats), whose boundaries are clarified only by description text rather than by name.
Every tool follows the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_check, get_check_stats, toggle_check, add_webhook_alert). Verb variety (get/set/add/send/toggle) is semantically meaningful rather than arbitrary.
15 tools is well within a healthy range for a monitoring service, and each maps to a real task: account setup, check CRUD, alert channel configuration, and read/investigation queries. No obvious filler or duplicate tooling.
Core lifecycle is covered for checks (create/update/toggle/delete/read), which is the heart of the domain. But there are notable gaps: webhooks can be added but never listed or removed, status pages are read-only (no create/update), folders are referenced in list_checks/create_check but have no management tools, and maintenance mode is exposed in get_check yet cannot be set.