FolderBridge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to FolderBridge MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to open, edit, check, run, emit, and save source programs through structured, revision-checked tools over stdio, confining paths to the launch root and returning diagnostics with fixes for rejected edits.5 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM clients to search, read, and patch a trusted source repository with rollback-safe edits, Git operations, and allowlisted validation over stdio or OAuth-protected HTTP. Keeps secrets and arbitrary shell access out of reach while enforcing bounded batched I/O and operator-controlled workspace trust.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides read-only workspace inspection, file reading, and search to Copilot agents via a stdio MCP server, with path containment and bounded output.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes a local code workspace to AI clients via stdio, providing file browsing and text search capabilities with path safety rules.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to safely read, search, understand, and edit local project code and files, with Git inspection, code indexing, and controlled command execution within permissioned workspaces.4 npm6MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to list, read, inspect, write, and precisely edit files and to regex-search a workspace, with every path confined to a sandboxed root directory. Token-saving output such as line-range reads and match locations without line content keeps context use low while guarded writes and ambiguous edits prevent accidental data loss.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: file operations, editing, reading/searching, metadata, specific format inspection, extension management, and server info. Even edit_file vs write_file are separated by size/chunking, and workspace vs file_info differ in scope. No overlapping or ambiguous tools.
All names use lowercase with underscores, but the verb/noun order varies: edit_file and write_file use verb_noun, while file_info and server_info use noun_verb, and workspace and extension are bare nouns. This inconsistency makes the pattern less predictable, though still readable.
10 tools is well-scoped for a file management and inspection server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (copy/move, create/edit, read/search, metadata, format inspection, extensions, diagnostics) without redundancy or bloat.
The surface covers most file lifecycle operations (create, edit, read, copy, move, metadata) but lacks a delete operation. Also missing directory creation and possibly rename (though move may cover that). These are notable gaps for a file management server.