Skip to main content
Glama
MoonTzai

FolderBridge MCP

by MoonTzai

Related Servers

Alternatives to FolderBridge MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to open, edit, check, run, emit, and save source programs through structured, revision-checked tools over stdio, confining paths to the launch root and returning diagnostics with fixes for rejected edits.
      4 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to search, read, and patch a trusted source repository with rollback-safe edits, Git operations, and allowlisted validation over stdio or OAuth-protected HTTP. Keeps secrets and arbitrary shell access out of reach while enforcing bounded batched I/O and operator-controlled workspace trust.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes a local code workspace to AI clients via stdio, providing file browsing and text search capabilities with path safety rules.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to safely read, search, understand, and edit local project code and files, with Git inspection, code indexing, and controlled command execution within permissioned workspaces.
      1 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives a compatible coding agent read-only access to bounded local verification of changes inside a single host-chosen workspace, exposing six stdio tools that inspect capabilities, static checks, impact analysis, policy evaluation, evidence generation, and suggested tests without shell access, plugin loading, or repository upload.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: file operations, editing, reading/searching, metadata, specific format inspection, extension management, and server info. Even edit_file vs write_file are separated by size/chunking, and workspace vs file_info differ in scope. No overlapping or ambiguous tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use lowercase with underscores, but the verb/noun order varies: edit_file and write_file use verb_noun, while file_info and server_info use noun_verb, and workspace and extension are bare nouns. This inconsistency makes the pattern less predictable, though still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for a file management and inspection server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (copy/move, create/edit, read/search, metadata, format inspection, extensions, diagnostics) without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers most file lifecycle operations (create, edit, read, copy, move, metadata) but lacks a delete operation. Also missing directory creation and possibly rename (though move may cover that). These are notable gaps for a file management server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues