clear_location_filter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the primary behavior (removes filter, affects restock alerts coverage). However, with no annotations, it does not mention edge cases (e.g., idempotency, what happens if no filter is set) or any side effects. The disclosure is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the main action ('Remove the geographic filter') and provides a clear consequence. It contains no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and a simple action, the description is largely complete. It explains what the tool does and its effect. A minor gap is the lack of mention about whether the action is reversible or its scope beyond restock alerts.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by explaining the tool's purpose beyond the empty schema. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description justifies it by clarifying the action and its effect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove the geographic filter' and the resource being acted upon. It distinguishes from the sibling tool set_location_filter by specifying that it removes the filter, and explains the consequence (restock alerts cover all stores in Quebec).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (when you want to remove the geographic filter and have alerts cover all stores). It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the context of having set_location_filter as a sibling provides clear differentiation. No exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.