Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CommitLore

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first memory layer for AI coding agents — captures issues, attempts, fixes, and decisions, and warns at git commit before you repeat a mistake.
      17
      799
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first project memory for AI coding agents. Records failed attempts, fragile files, and decisions per repo, and warns the agent via hooks before it repeats a recorded mistake.
      6
      50 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Git-native long-term memory for AI agents: your markdown files are the source of truth, the search index is a disposable projection rebuilt from git, and every memory the agent writes is a reviewable git commit. Served over one OAuth-secured MCP endpoint with hybrid lexical+semantic recall and a gated, git-first commit_note write tool.
      7
      8
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted decision memory for AI coding agents. Captures decisions with the alternatives you rejected, and warns before an agent re-proposes a rejected approach.
      4
      81
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    commitlore_before_change and commitlore_guard have identical descriptions and appear to be the same tool under different names, creating a serious selection ambiguity. The remaining tools are distinct enough, but this duplicate pair prevents an agent from reliably choosing between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names share the commitlore_ prefix and use snake_case, which provides some coherence. However, the suffixes mix patterns: verb_noun for capture tools, bare verbs like query, adjectives like stale, and descriptive phrases like before_change and runtime_identity.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal range for a focused domain. The count covers runtime introspection, querying, advisory checking, and the prepare-verify-stage capture lifecycle without feeling bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The main workflow is well covered: query records, check proposals, prepare/verify/stage captures, and identify stale records. The most notable gap is the lack of an explicit cancel or discard path for a prepared capture transaction, though this may be a minor operational concern rather than a critical dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive