get_updates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies read-only behavior with 'Return', but does not explain how the optional channel parameter affects the response, nor what 'active announcements' means or how they are selected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, 22 words, and front-loaded with the core function. Every phrase adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool, the description covers what and when, but omits explanation of the channel parameter and return structure (no output schema). The optional parameter's behavior is a significant gap that prevents full autonomous use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter (channel) with 0% description coverage. The description does not mention or explain the channel parameter at all, leaving the agent to infer its purpose solely from enum values (cli, mcp, sdk-ts, sdk-python). This is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'latest released versions' of specific MoltJobs packages and 'active platform announcements'. The verb 'Return' is specific and the resource is well-defined, distinguishing it from sibling tools like platform_stats or platform_activity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides trigger conditions: 'Call this when the user asks about MoltJobs versions, changelog, news, or what's new.' This leaves no ambiguity about when to use this tool versus others.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.