Skip to main content
Glama
MoleCare

MoleCare MCP Server

Official
by MoleCare
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MoleCare MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clinical-mcp

      sarathi-aiml
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables clinical workflows including search and summarization of synthetic FHIR patient records, PubMed literature search, and HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification of text, via any MCP client.
      MIT

    • health-example

      pietrodileo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables secure, read-only access to synthetic preventive-care patient records and bounded IRIS namespace health metrics through a small set of allowlisted, parameterized tools.
      MIT

    • policy-corpus

      MkRafa
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server providing 5 tools for hybrid search, clause retrieval, policy versioning, code lookup, and plan rider override queries over a synthetic medical-policy corpus.
      -

    • successfactors-mcp-prototype

      Vidushibot
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables answering authorized HR questions by exposing a set of read-only MCP tools over synthetic SuccessFactors-style data, with optional AI agent orchestration and configurable modes for mock, demo, or real test tenant usage.
      -

    • FHIR MCP Server

      baala-saravanan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI applications to query and retrieve healthcare data (patients, conditions, observations, medications) from a public FHIR R4 server via MCP tools.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct with clear purposes, but there is some potential overlap between search_medical_info and search_medical_concepts (both retrieve medical knowledge) and between get_mole_analysis and classify_lesion_features (both describe ABCDE features). However, the descriptions clarify the differences—one is for stored mole records, the other for supplied lesion features.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_user_moles, search_medical_info, lookup_medical_concept). The verbs (get, search, compare, lookup, map, assess, classify) are specific and the pattern is uniform, making the API predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a distinct function within the skin health education domain. The scope feels appropriately sized—not too sparse, not overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflows: viewing user mole data, analyzing changes, retrieving medical info, looking up concepts, mapping codes, and understanding risk factors. A minor gap is the lack of tools for adding/updating mole records, but given the educational (non-CRUD) purpose, this is acceptable. Also, there is no explicit 'get_mole_photo' tool, though compare_moles implies photo access.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources