MoleCare MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to MoleCare MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to explore a read-only Oracle Health (Cerner) FHIR R4 public sandbox by finding synthetic patients, inspecting which parts of their records hold data, and searching or reading trimmed FHIR resources.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients and LLM agents to perform full CRUD operations on FHIR resources, query and manipulate clinical data through natural-language prompts, and use document ingestion, semantic search, and terminology lookup against a FHIR backend.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents and MCP-compatible clients to perform CRUD operations on healthcare resources, query clinical data with natural-language prompts, and use semantic document search, LOINC terminology lookup, and OAuth2-backed API access.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceExposes clinical question answering, guideline search, and minimum-necessary FHIR patient context as tools to any MCP client.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to query device status, customer data, orders, and open incidents, and draft incident notes using mock SAP data.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to discover and use The Holistic Care's approved public mindfulness resources, including interactive games, guided audio practices, research summaries, a glossary, and the public PanchaVikas framework, through read-only tools and static resources. No authentication is required, and it wraps a public REST API without creating, modifying, or deleting anything.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Tools are largely distinct with clear purposes, but there is some potential overlap between search_medical_info and search_medical_concepts (both retrieve medical knowledge) and between get_mole_analysis and classify_lesion_features (both describe ABCDE features). However, the descriptions clarify the differences—one is for stored mole records, the other for supplied lesion features.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_user_moles, search_medical_info, lookup_medical_concept). The verbs (get, search, compare, lookup, map, assess, classify) are specific and the pattern is uniform, making the API predictable.
14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a distinct function within the skin health education domain. The scope feels appropriately sized—not too sparse, not overwhelming.
The tool set covers the core workflows: viewing user mole data, analyzing changes, retrieving medical info, looking up concepts, mapping codes, and understanding risk factors. A minor gap is the lack of tools for adding/updating mole records, but given the educational (non-CRUD) purpose, this is acceptable. Also, there is no explicit 'get_mole_photo' tool, though compare_moles implies photo access.