Skip to main content
Glama
Mohith535

NitroWatch

by Mohith535

Related Servers

Alternatives to NitroWatch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted governance layer for MCP servers that enforces policies, audits tool calls, and manages approvals for AI agents.
      4
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Runtime permission, approval, and audit governance for AI agent tool execution, enabling human oversight of risky actions via an MCP server.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A governance and control layer for MCP tools that manages tool requests as intents through policy-based approval, queuing, or blocking. It enables secure human oversight and audit trails for consequential agent actions across platforms like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      1
      MIT No Attribution
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A policy-enforcing MCP gateway that intercepts all tool calls to downstream MCP servers, applying allow/deny/ask rules with human approval and audit logging for safe access to dangerous tools.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct function: registration, discovery, classification, override, request, approval listing, approve, deny, promote, revoke, trust status, audit log, budget, and glue generation. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., register_server, classify_tools, approve_action). No mixed casing or inconsistent verb styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool covers a distinct step in the governance workflow. The count feels justified by the breadth of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: register, discover, classify, request, approve, promote, revoke, audit. Missing server removal or listing (e.g., unregister_server) is a minor gap, but agents can work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues