Skip to main content
Glama
Mohith535

NitroWatch Billing Demo

by Mohith535

Related Servers

Alternatives to NitroWatch Billing Demo

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing guarded access to a B2B SaaS billing database (customers, subscriptions, invoices, credit notes) and live ECB exchange rates, with read-only tools and one capped, idempotent write for issuing credit notes.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate audit reports and query financial ledger data via MCP. This demo version contains intentional security vulnerabilities for security testing and should not be used in production.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Askell's payment and subscription API, allowing users to discover API operations, make raw API calls with approval for mutations, and analyze customers, contracts, billing runs, and webhooks.
      430
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, and expenses via the Invox API, supporting actions like drafting, sending, cancelling, and marking invoices as paid, as well as logging expenses and updating client information.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An intentionally vulnerable MCP server designed as a live demo target for the MCP Trust security scanner. It contains deliberate insecure patterns to demonstrate scanning capabilities.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: get_invoice retrieves a single invoice, list_invoices retrieves multiple, send_invoice emails an invoice, and archive_customer vs delete_account clearly separate soft from permanent customer removal. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get/list/send/archive/delete + resource). The use of 'get' for singular and 'list' for plural is conventional, and there is no mixing of styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a billing demo. It covers the essential operations without unnecessary bloat, and the count feels appropriate for its purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers invoice retrieval, emailing, and customer lifecycle (archive/delete), but lacks invoice creation, updating, or voiding. This is a minor gap for a billing system, but core workflows are still represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues